USPTO serial 75939612
EDQM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDQM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Tognino, David J. Kappos, Margaret A. Pepper, Gina M. Lyons
ALEXANDER TOGNINO DAVID J KAPPOS MARG INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & LICENSINGN CASTLE DRARMONK, NY 10504Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO ASSESS, IMPROVE, PROCESS, AND ANALYZE DIGITAL INFORMATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED FOR WAREHOUSING DIGITAL INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS AND GUIDES FOR PREPARING SOFTWARE FOR ASSESSING, IMPROVING, PROCESSING, ANALYZING, AND WAREHOUSING DIGITAL INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | COMPUTER EDUCATION TRAINING IN THE FIELDS OF ASSESSING, IMPROVING, ANALYZING, AND WAREHOUSING OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, AND THE USE OF SOFTWARE FOR ASSESSING, IMPROVING, ANALYZING, AND WAREHOUSING OF DIGITAL INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | TECHNICAL SUPPORT, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE PROBLEMS VIA TELEPHONE, E-MAIL, AND SITE VISITS; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF ASSESSING, IMPROVING, ANALYZING, AND WAREHOUSING OF DIGITAL INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vality Technology Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Vality Technology Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EDQM
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |