USPTO serial 75939731
BETTER LOCKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2791733Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 9, 2003
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BETTER LOCKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
Burton S. Ehrlich LADAS & PARRY224 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUESuite 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | NON-MEDICATED HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KEYSTONE LABORATORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KEYSTONE LABORATORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KEYSTONE LABORATORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named BETTER LOCKS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |