USPTO serial 75939898
PINNZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PINNZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Singapore, SG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott R. Hansen
SCOTT R HANSEN OPPENHEIMER, WOLFF & DONNELLY LLP2029 CENTURY PARK ELOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer operating programs, recorded; computer peripheral devices; computer programmes [programs], recorded; computer software [recorded]; computers; integrated circuit cards [smart cards]; telephone apparatus; telephone receivers; telephone transmitters | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | communications by computer terminals; communications by fiber optic networks; communications by telephone; computer aided transmission of messages and images; electronic mail; facsimile transmission; message sending; paging services [radio, telephone or other means of electronic communication]; telephone services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |