USPTO serial 75939941
CATALYST DEVELOPMENT ENGINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CATALYST DEVELOPMENT ENGINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CATALYTICA ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
DSM CATALYTICA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Mountain View, CA
Other trademarks owned by DSM CATALYTICA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Ann Arbor, MI
Ann Arbor, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul J. Kennedy
PAUL J KENNEDY PEPPER HAMILTON, LLPEIGHTEENTH AND ARCH STS3000 TWO LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | CHEMICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF CATALYSTS USED IN CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING PROCESSES AND IN MANUFACTURING MATERIALS USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF DIVERSE END PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CATALYTICA ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CATALYTICA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DSM CATALYTICA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NOVODYNAMICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NOVODYNAMICS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CATALYST DEVELOPMENT ENGINE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |