Drawing for ROLLING SPACEFRAME

USPTO serial 75940300

ROLLING SPACEFRAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROLLING SPACEFRAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. Leonardi

ATTN: ROBERT M LEONARDI DANA TECHNOLOGY INC3222 W CENTRAL AVETOLEDO, OH 43606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Land vehicle component modules comprised of a frame, front axle, rear axle, wheel end assemblies, brakes, suspension system and optionally, a driveshaft assemble, steering system, wheels and tiresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 16, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 1, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 1, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 7, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance