USPTO serial 75940494
TULIP TOWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TULIP TOWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mount Vernon, WA
Mount Vernon, WA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Developing promotional campaigns for businesses related to flowers, namely, tulips; promoting the sale of goods and services of others relating to flowers, namely, tulips, through the distribution of printed material and promotional contests; wholesale distributorships featuring flowers, namely, tulips; wholesale store featuring flowers, namely, tulips; retail shops and stores featuring flowers and related gift items; computerized on-line retail services featuring tulips and related gift items | ACTIVE | Apr 4, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |