USPTO serial 75940635
B:REAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B:REAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SHAMPOOS, CONDITIONERS, HAIR SPRAY, MOUSSE, GELS, TINTS, COLORS, ENHANCERS, HAIR POLISH, STRAIGHTENERS, SETTING LOTIONS, REVITALIZERS, FINISHING SHINES, VOLUMIZERS, STYLING FOAMS, DETANGLERS, WAVING LOTION, NEUTRALIZERS, COSMETICS, NAMELY, MAKE UP, SKIN TONERS, FACE POWDER, LIPSTICK, BLUSHES, FACIAL CREAMS, FACE MASKS, BASE CONCEALER, MASCARA, EYE SHADOW, LIP CONTOUR PENCIL, EYEBROW PENCIL, LIP GLOSS, BLUSH; BODY CARE PRODUCERS, NAMELY CREAMS, LOTIONS, BODY POWDER, MOISTURIZERS, TONERS, BODY BRONZERS, DEODORANTS, BATH CONDITIONERS, BATH GELS, BODY GLITTER, SKIN AND FACIAL SOAPS, SUN BLOCK PREPARATIONS, NAIL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, ARTIFICIAL FINGERNAILS, NAIL COATING, AND BODY CARE CLEANSER, SOAP, SHAMPOOS, CONDITIONERS, OILS, BATHING SALES, MASSAGE OILS, LOTIONS, CREAMS AND GELS, POWDERS, | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1999 |
| 004 | CANDLES | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1999 |
| 025 | CLOTHING, FOOTWEAR, HEAD GEAR | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |