USPTO serial 75940650
SITESUITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SITESUITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sydney NSW 2008, AU
Sydney NSW 2008, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. McKie
JOHN E MCKIE LADAS & PARRY224 S MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software, including HTML programs, for use in website design, website building, website management and website updating; computer hardware and software for Internet-based management of databases and websites | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic mail services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design for others; computer consultation services; website design services; hosting Internet websites for others on a computer server; website management services for others; maintenance and updating of computer software; help and support services provided via telephone, by e-mail, in person and online over the Internet, in the fields of website hosting and management, and for computer software for website design, building and management; providing technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via telephone, e-mail, in person and online; providing links to a website on the Internet in the fields of website design, building, hosting and management; providing for others a website on the Internet for on-line application in website design, in changing pages on websites, for management of website ecommerce, in tracking website use and for registering websites with search engines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SUTTON, CHRIS
- Other trademarks owned by BAXTER, SCOTT, DAVID
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SITESUITE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |