Drawing for PEER PARTNERING

USPTO serial 75940712

PEER PARTNERING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEER PARTNERING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK J. DILIBERTI

MARK J DILIBERTI FOLEY & LARDNER777 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 3800MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management, consulting, marketing, and product research; business management, consulting, marketing and product research in the field of product research and developmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance