USPTO serial 75940913
GIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES N J RUGGIERO
CHARLES N J RUGGIERO OHLANDT GREELEY RUGGIERO & PERLE LLP1 LANDMARK SQ 9TH FLSTAMFORD, CT 06901-2682UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | HAND PERCUSSION INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, CONGAS, BONGOS, TIMBALES, DRUMS, COWBELLS, BLOCKS, TAMBOURINES, CHIMES, BELLS, TRIANGLES, SHEKERES, GUIROS, SHAKERS, MARACAS, CLAVES, CASTANETS, WHISTLES, CYMBALS, GONGS, STICKS, BEATERS; MOUNTING BRACKETS AND STANDS FOR DRUMS USED SOLELY FOR MUSICAL PURPOSES; ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, CASES AND BAGS FOR HAND PERCUSSION INSTRUMENTS AND DRUMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Latin Percussion, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Latin Percussion, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by KAMAN MUSIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 015
- Similar marks named GIO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |