USPTO serial 75940928
I-STREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I-STREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Saldamarco
MICHAEL J SALDAMARCO SALDAMARCO & ASSOCIATES PCSTE 212 PERRYMONT BLDG8150 PERRY HWYPITTSBURGH, PA 15237-5232Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | i-Stream is a software-driven service which delivers World Wide Web-ready images synchronized with audio voice-transcription and video via a Web browser This technology- utilizes RealNetwork's G2-level codes for audio and video as well as the World Wide Web Consortium standard SMIL (Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language) i-Stream parses a log file (produced by proprietary software) generated by key commands from Microsoft Powerpoint presentation documents The resulting log file is used to generate (through a proprietary database parsing engine) a RealPix, RealText, SMIL and Hypertext Markup Language document viewed within a Web browser All of which allows a user to simultaneously view a Microsoft Powerpoint presentation the transcription of that presentation and the audio feed from the live presenter | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |