Drawing for FASHION ACTIVE LABORATORY BY JEFFREY GRUBB

USPTO serial 75940932

FASHION ACTIVE LABORATORY BY JEFFREY GRUBB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FASHION ACTIVE LABORATORY BY JEFFREY GRUBB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mitchell E. Radin

MITCHELL E RADIN COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP41 MADISON AVE 34TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Bags, namely, duffel bags, handbags, luggage, purses, backpacks, messenger bags, pocketbooks, carry-on bags, beach bagsACTIVE—
025Women's sportswear, namely, T-shirts, trousers, sweaters, woven shirts, woven jackets, woven pants, woven shorts, woven dresses, woven skirts, knitwear, namely, knit tops, knit jackets, knit pants, knit shorts, knit dresses, knit skirts, sweaters, bra tops, camisoles, tank tops, leggings, jumpsuits, coats, robes, scarves; women's active-wear, namely, tank tops, bra tops, camisoles, T-shirts, tights, leggings, shorts, panties, pants, leotards, jumpsuits, jackets, sweatshirts, sweatpants, sweat-suits and polo shirts, Outerwear, namely, windbreakers and raincoatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 16, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 16, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 26, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 26, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 25, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 4, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance