Drawing for NEVADA BOB'S GOLF

USPTO serial 75941062

NEVADA BOB'S GOLF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEVADA BOB'S GOLF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ

SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON, PRICE, HOLMAN & STERN, PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Golf umbrellasACTIVE—
025Golf clothing, namely, shirts, hats, sweaters, pants, socks, jackets, rain suits, windbreakers, belts, and golf shoesACTIVE—
028Golf sporting goods, namely, golf balls, golf bags, golf bag straps, golf bag tag, golf ball marker, golf clubs, golf bag covers, swing ring, golf club practice swing weight, golf gloves; practice driving ball with string, divot repair tools, golf putters, golf tees, bead score counter, golf club covers, shag bag, non-motorized golf carts, golf glove shaper, golf spikes, golf grip scrub, namely, a small brush to slide over golf club grips to prevent grips from slipping in golfers hands, flag stick and cup, golf practice net and post set, golf practice range, namely, an aluminum frame with attached netting, golf club headcovers, putter caddy, golf club caddy, golf ball caddyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 20, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 17, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Oct 12, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 5, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 16, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance