USPTO serial 75941337
CHARLIE IN THE BOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHARLIE IN THE BOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARC A BERGSMAN
MARC A BERGSMAN DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC1901 L ST N WSTE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances | ABANDONED | Sep 30, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |