USPTO serial 75941524
U.S. ORGANIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 22, 2003
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with U.S. ORGANIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J BISCHOFF
CHRISTOPHER J BISCHOFF Bischoff & Associates, Ltd.1650 Payne StreetEvanston, IL 60201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair and skin conditioners, hair care preparations, hair shampoo, hair detanglers, hair gels, hair mouses hair relaxers, hair rinses and hair dyes, skin cream, personal deodorant, deodorant soaps, breath freshener, tooth paste, tooth polish, perfumes, laundry detergents, fabric softener, furniture cleaners, floor polishes, carpet cleaners, carpet shampoos, and fabric cleaners and upholstery cleaners | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 13, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |