USPTO serial 75941574
SG FOOTWEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SG FOOTWEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Zail
MICHAEL E ZAILTWO YORKSHIRE DRSUFFERN, NY 10901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |