USPTO serial 75941594
ULTRARICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRARICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID J ONSAGER
G S KHALSA METAGENICS100 AVENIDA LA PATASAN CLEMENTE, CA 92673UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | RICE FOOD INGREDIENTS USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF NUTRITIONAL FOOD SUPPLEMENTS FOR PERSONS WITH GASTROINTESTINAL CONDITIONS AND FOOD ALLERGIES OR FOOD ALLERGY RELATED CONDITIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |