USPTO serial 75941705
BENEFITS U
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BENEFITS U?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604-2508UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary and nutritional supplements; vitamin preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer hardware; apparatus and instruments for the input, output, storage, retrieval, display and communication of data and information; computer peripheral apparatus; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods; computer software and computer programmes, including those relating to or containing information relating to health, fitness, wellness, physical and mental development and well-being, injury prevention and health risk prevention; electronic publications, recorded tapes, discs, cassettes and CD-ROMs | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter; printed publications; stationery; personal organizers and replacement pages for personal organizers; information in printed form relating to health, fitness, wellness, physical and mental development and well-being, injury prevention and health risk prevention | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Health club services; provision of gymnasium and fitness facilities; keep fit instruction services; education services, provision of courses, seminars, conferences and training relating to health, fitness, wellness, physical and mental development and well-being, injury prevention and health risk prevention; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid services, provided via electronic media, including the Internet, or non-electronic media | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Health services and provision of information relating thereto; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to health, fitness, wellness, physical and mental development and well-being, injury prevention and health risk prevention; on-going provision of personal health assessments and evaluations; provision of information relating to specialist health advisors, medical therapists and alternative medical therapists; all the aforesaid services provided via electronic media, including the Internet, or non-electronic media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bladerunner Corporation UK Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BENEFITS U
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2019 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 23, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |