USPTO serial 75941716
SABER CONSULTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SABER CONSULTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Marr
DAVID J MARR TREXLER, BUSHNELL, GIANGIORGI, ET AL105 W ADAMSSTE 3600CHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION OUTSIDE OF THE TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRIES; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING NETWORK WEB PAGES FOR OTHERS OUTSIDE OF THE TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRIES; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS OUTSIDE OF THE TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRIES; DATABASE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES OUTSIDE OF THE TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRIES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS OUTSIDE OF THE TRAVEL AND TRANS PORTION INDUSTRIES | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |