Drawing for INTERNET DEVICE BUILDER CONFERENCE

USPTO serial 75941733

INTERNET DEVICE BUILDER CONFERENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERNET DEVICE BUILDER CONFERENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth L Mitchell

KENNETH L MITCHELL WOODLING KROST & RUST9213 CHILLICOTHE RDKIRTLAND, OH 44094UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035organizing and conducting trade shows and trade conferences in the field of the global computer information networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 26, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 26, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 31, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 29, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 29, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance