USPTO serial 75941923
BUSYMOM.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUSYMOM.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Grand Rapids, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy Thomas-Mellema
AMY THOMAS-MELLEMA MEIJER INC2929 WALKER AVEGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49544UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized on-line retail services in the field of family management, namely, family calendars and daily schedule planners; Advertising services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others through discounts and partnerships with other retailers via the Internet | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Providing information in the field of family health via a computer network | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |