USPTO serial 75941977
NATURE'S GOODNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2005
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NATURE'S GOODNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BOISE, ID
BOISE, ID
BOISE, ID
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
OAK BROOK, IL
Oak Brook, IL
Pittsburgh, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jo Osborn
Jo Osborn TREEHOUSE FOODS, INC.2021 Spring RoadOak Brook, IL 60523UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | BABY FOOD | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PROMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PROMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PROMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DEL MONTE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by TREEHOUSE FOODS, IINC.
- Other trademarks owned by THF EQUITIES, LP
- Other trademarks owned by H. J. HEINZ COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named NATURE'S GOODNESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |