USPTO serial 75942244
UNITY WIRELESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNITY WIRELESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burnaby, British Columbia V5J 5B9, CA
Bellevue, WA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | RF subsystems and components, wireless IP connection devices and peripherals, and firmware therefor for gathering, storing and generating digital and analog information and signals and communicating digital and analog information and signals wirelessly to and through a global computer network and other public and private computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and repair of computer hardware, peripherals, firmware and software and wireless communications equipment used in digital and analog wireless network systems, and wireless computer communications network systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services, namely advising others on the use, operation, maintenance, and manufacture of digital and analog wireless network systems, and wireless computer communications network systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UNITY WIRELESS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Sonic Systems Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named UNITY WIRELESS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |