USPTO serial 75942251
ST. ANDREWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 2002
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ST. ANDREWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Staffordshire, GB
WILMINGTON, DE
Staffordshire, GB
Staffordshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn A. Gromlovits
Kathryn A. Gromlovits Adams Intellectual Property Law, P.A.Suite 2350 Charlotte Plaza201 S. College StreetCharlotte, NC 28244Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | ceramic dinnerware, ornamentalware and giftware; namely, tea sets, coffee[ set] *sets*, [ sups, ] * cups * saucers, plates, bowls, dishes, sauce boats, jugs, teapots, coffee pots, egg cups | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Doulton (UK) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by WWRD IPCO LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Doulton (UK) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Doulton (UK) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ST. ANDREWS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |