USPTO serial 75942662
PVAB SPEED BUMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2756606Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2003
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PVAB SPEED BUMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Petersburg, FL
GENERAL DYNAMICS ORDNANCE AND TACTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
ST. PETERSBURG, FL
Other trademarks owned by GENERAL DYNAMICS ORDNANCE AND TACTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
GENERAL DYNAMICS ORDNANCE AND TACTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
ST. PETERSBURG, FL
Other trademarks owned by GENERAL DYNAMICS ORDNANCE AND TACTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
ST. PETERSBURG, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger P. Furey, Esq.
Roger P. Furey, Esq., Rebecca E. McDougall, Esq. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP2900 K Street, N.W.Suite 200Washington, DC 20007-5118Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | NON-LETHAL VEHICLE STOPPING SYSTEM; NAMELY A PORTABLE VEHICLE ARRESTING BARRIER WITH AN ELECTRONIC SELECTIVELY-DEPLOYABLE NET USED TO STOP AND CAPTURE WHEELED VEHICLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 6, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Primex Technologies, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL DYNAMICS ORDNANCE AND TACTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL DYNAMICS ORDNANCE AND TACTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Primex Technologies, Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PVAB SPEED BUMP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |