USPTO serial 75942990
DAIYAT.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAIYAT.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Larry H. Tronco
Larry H. Tronco Lathrop & Gage L.C.Suite 1847230 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10169Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Internet information delivery services, namely, providing consumer information in the field of adult education, adult entertainment, alcohol, alternative lifestyle interests, amusement park rides, animals, art, astrology, bars, beauty, beauty pageants, books,camps, charitable events, children's entertainment, classes, clubs and organizations, coffee houses, comedy, comedy clubs, community events, computers, computer games, contests, cruises, dance, dance clubs, dating, dating services, demonstrations, dining, DVD's, exercise, exhibitions, exhibits, fairs, family entertainment, farms, festivals, fireworks displays, fitness, foods, fundraisers, games, gyms, hobbies, home entertainment, humor, interactive play areas, internet, karaoke, landmarks, lectures, leisure activities, magazines, magic, make-up, movies, motivational speakers, multi-media entertainment, music, news, nightlife, on-line reviews, on-line dating services, on-line services, outdoor activities, parks, parties, performance art, personal appearances, personal care services, poetry, poetry slams, radio, recreational activities, recreational theme parks, reservation services, roller derbies, seminars, shows, social events, spas, spa services, special events, speeches, sporting contests, sporting events, television programs, theater, theatrical performances, tours, travel, trends, videos, visual and audio performances, volunteer activities, websites, wine and yoga | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Computer services, namely, commercial lending services, credit card transaction processing services, electronic cash transactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation of computer networks and systems; maintenance and repair of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment information relating to air shows, amusement parks, amusement park rides, art exhibitions, cabarets, circuses, dance performances, fashion shows, laser shows, light shows, magic shows, museums, live musical concerts, wine tasting and zoos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Halkes, Adrian
- Other trademarks owned by Halkes, Adrian
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DAIYAT.COM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2004 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |