Drawing for SONIC IMMERSION

USPTO serial 75943216

SONIC IMMERSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SONIC IMMERSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sandra Wright

SANDRA WRIGHT RICHARDS BUELL SUTTON401 W GEORGE ST STE 700VANCOUVER, BC V6B 5A1CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SOUND EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, MULTI-CHANNEL SOUND PROCESSORS; AUDIO TRANSMITTERS, AMPLIFIERS AND RECEIVERS; DIGITAL DELAY AND EFFECTS CONTROL PROCESSORS; DIGITAL SOUND HARMONIZERS; DIGITAL STEREO SAMPLERS AND AUDIO SOUND CONTROLLERS; ELECTRONIC SOUND PROCESSING EQUIPMENT FOR THE PROCESSING, RECORDING, REPRODUCTION, TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION OF SURROUND SOUND; MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS, NAMELY, PRE-RECORDED DIGITAL VIDEO DISCSACTIVE—
015MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, GUITARS AND KEYBOARDSACTIVE—
041MUSIC COMPOSITION FOR OTHERS; MUSIC PUBLISHING SERVICES; SOUND RECORDING STUDIO SERVICESACTIVE—
042OPERATION OF A BUSINESS PROVIDING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF ELECTRONIC AND DIGITAL SOUND PROCESSESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 4, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 8, 2007CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 7, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 30, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 23, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 23, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 22, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 17, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 12, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 4, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 18, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance