USPTO serial 75943216
SONIC IMMERSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SONIC IMMERSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ANDY & BOB'S CRAZY ENTERPRISES INC.
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Other trademarks owned by ANDY & BOB'S CRAZY ENTERPRISES INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra Wright
SANDRA WRIGHT RICHARDS BUELL SUTTON401 W GEORGE ST STE 700VANCOUVER, BC V6B 5A1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOUND EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, MULTI-CHANNEL SOUND PROCESSORS; AUDIO TRANSMITTERS, AMPLIFIERS AND RECEIVERS; DIGITAL DELAY AND EFFECTS CONTROL PROCESSORS; DIGITAL SOUND HARMONIZERS; DIGITAL STEREO SAMPLERS AND AUDIO SOUND CONTROLLERS; ELECTRONIC SOUND PROCESSING EQUIPMENT FOR THE PROCESSING, RECORDING, REPRODUCTION, TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION OF SURROUND SOUND; MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS, NAMELY, PRE-RECORDED DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS | ACTIVE | — |
| 015 | MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, GUITARS AND KEYBOARDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | MUSIC COMPOSITION FOR OTHERS; MUSIC PUBLISHING SERVICES; SOUND RECORDING STUDIO SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | OPERATION OF A BUSINESS PROVIDING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF ELECTRONIC AND DIGITAL SOUND PROCESSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ANDY & BOB'S CRAZY ENTERPRISES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 015
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SONIC IMMERSION
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |