USPTO serial 75943525
M T MAHINDRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M T MAHINDRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAMELA E. POWERS
PAMELA E POWERS BROWN MCCARROLL LLP1111 BAGBY, 47TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002-2543UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Tractor engine parts, namely oil, air and fuel filters for motors and engines, radiator caps, steering leakages, mufflers, axles, gears, bearings, belts, hoses, sway bars, knobs, levers, clutches, fuel pumps, hydraulic pumps, stabilizer arms, weights, drive shafts, rollbars, auxiliary valves, power takeoffs; agricultural implements, namely box blades, tillers, plows, mowers and snowblowers; and attachments, namely front end loaders, canopies, bale spears, and pallet forks | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Motor land vehicles, namely tractors; tractor engines, parts and accessories for land vehicles, namely, engines, transmissions, clutches, brakes, suspension systems for the foregoing vehicles, chassis, structural parts for the foregoing vehicles, alloy vehicle wheels, and canopies for tractors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mahindra & Mahindra Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Mahindra & Mahindra Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named M T MAHINDRA
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |