USPTO serial 75943530
ARC-MET MOBILELAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2936524Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2005
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARC-MET MOBILELAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
02630 Espoo, FI
02630 Espoo, FI
02630 Espoo, FI
OXFORD INSTRUMENTS ANALYTICAL OY
ESPOO, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J. Orlando
Cynthia C. Weber Bricker & Eckler LLP100 S. Third StreetAtt'n Joseph R. DreitlerColumbus, OH 43215-4291Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical emission analyzers for determining the composition of alloys | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Metorex International Oy
- Other trademarks owned by Metorex International Oy
- Other trademarks owned by Metorex International Oy
- Other trademarks owned by OXFORD INSTRUMENTS ANALYTICAL OY
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ARC-MET MOBILELAB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |