USPTO serial 75943577
TECHNOLOGICAL EVERGREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHNOLOGICAL EVERGREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jon O. Webster
JON O WEBSTER BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORATEDONE BAUSCH & LOMB PLROCHESTER, NY 14604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | ophthalmic surgical equipment, namely lasers, surgical cutlery, phacoemulsification machines and microkeratome blades | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BAUSCH & LOMB SURGICAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named TECHNOLOGICAL EVERGREEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2006 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |