USPTO serial 75943613
BCOM3 GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BCOM3 GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Davis
DAVID J DAVIS BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SHORTS, PANTS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, BLOUSES, JACKETS, COATS, RAINCOATS, JACKETS, VESTS, INFANT SUITS, OVERALLS, SWEATERS, SLEEPWEAR, TIGHTS, UNDERWEAR, BRAS, GLOVES, MITTENS AND BELTS; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, SHOES, SOCKS AND BOOTS; HEADGEAR, NAMELY, HATS, VISORS AND HEADBANDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ADVERTISING AGENCY SERVICES; BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE AREA OF BRAND CREATION AND BRAND CONTENT CREATION ACROSS ALL FORMS OF COMMUNICATION; BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS AND MARKETING; BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS TO BUSINESS AND BUSINESS TO CONSUMER BRAND CREATION AND E-COMMERCE STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | INSTRUCTION AND TRAINING IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS ADVERTISING AND MARKETING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BDM, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BDM, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BCOM3 GROUP
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |