USPTO serial 75943722
ASTRAL POOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASTRAL POOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
08208 Sabadell, Barcelona, ES
08208 Sabadell, Barcelona, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy F. Divino
Amy F. Divino Cozen O'Connor250 Park AvenueSuite 1000New York, NY 10177Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WATER PURIFYING CHEMICALS FOR USE IN SWIMMING POOLS; CHEMICAL PREPARATIONS IN THE NATURE OF FILTERING MATERIALS FOR USE IN SWIMMING POOLS; CHLORINE FOR SWIMMING POOLS; SCALE REMOVING PREPARATION FOR USE IN SWIMMING POOLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |