Drawing for ETHNIC ACCENTS

USPTO serial 75943763

ETHNIC ACCENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEARIN, AMY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ETHNIC ACCENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric D. Paulsrud

ERIC D PAULSRUD LEONARD, ST AND DEINARD150 S FIFTH STSTE 2300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment in the nature of television programs in the field of home decorACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 12, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 4, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 4, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 4, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 6, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 2, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 8, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Oct 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 22, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance