USPTO serial 75943763
ETHNIC ACCENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ETHNIC ACCENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric D. Paulsrud
ERIC D PAULSRUD LEONARD, ST AND DEINARD150 S FIFTH STSTE 2300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of television programs in the field of home decor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |