USPTO serial 75943898
THE LITTLE RED BARN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE LITTLE RED BARN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Aldermaston RG7 4LH, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley M. Ganz
BRADLEY M GANZ GANZ LAW PCPO BOX 2200HILLSBORO, OR 97123UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed matter and publications, namely books and magazines in the field of cooking, recipes and food preparation; stationery, calendars and diaries | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Confectionery and sugar confectionery, namely candy; cakes; pies; breads, biscuits; pastry; cake, bread and pastry mixes; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; prepared snacks, namely puffed corn snacks; flower; rice; tapioca; cocoa; chocolate; honey; treacle; coffee; tea; preparations made from coffee, namely iced coffee and coffee-based beverages containing milk or flavorings; preparations made from tea, namely iced tea and tea-based beverages containing fruit or other flavorings; ice cream; flavored ices; and frozen yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Cafe, cafeteria and restaurant services; catering and cooking services; preparation of food and drink; fast food services and catering services for the provision of fast food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |