Drawing for NO MERCY

USPTO serial 75943974

NO MERCY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NO MERCY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK B. EISEN

MARK B EISEN DIMOCK STRATTON CLARIZIO LLP20 QUEEN ST WSTE 3202 BOX 102TORONTO, ON M5H 3R3

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008TOY MODEL HOBBYCRAFT KIT ACCESSORIES, NAMELY SCREWDRIVERSABANDONEDDec 6, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2003ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 21, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 21, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 6, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance