USPTO serial 75943983
ENAVIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENAVIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-51368 Leverkusen-Bayerwerk, DE
D-51368 Leverkusen-Bayerwerk, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley C. Macel, III
STANLEY C MACEL III CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLPPO BOX 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899-2207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of sexual dysfunction cardiovascular diseases, cancer, respiratory and infectious diseases, diagnostics adapted for medical use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 13, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |