USPTO serial 75943994
CORGENTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2908909Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 7, 2004
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CORGENTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Spencer Chen
Spencer Chen Anesiva, Inc.400 Oyster Point Boulevard, Suite 502South San Francisco, CA 94080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Scientific research, consultation, and pharmaceutical and device design and development services in the treatment of cardiovascular disease and tumors, ischemia, and coronary conditions and disorders | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Caber Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Caber Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Caber Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by ANESIVA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CORGENTECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2002 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |