USPTO serial 75945119
KNOWLEDGE OVER DISTANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KNOWLEDGE OVER DISTANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Carlos, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank S. Farrell
KIMBERLY A NUTE SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG WOESSNER ET ALP O BOX 2938MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-6900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN TRANSMITTING AND INTEGRATING MULTIPLE MEDIA INCLUDING DATABASE INFORMATION, DOCUMENTS, E-MAIL, INTERACTIVE CHAT, WEB SITES, VOICE TELEPHONE CALLS, AUTOMATED VOICE RESPONSES, AUTOMATED E-MAIL RESPONSES OVER TCP/IP NETWORKS, THE INTERNET AND PUBLIC TELEPHONE NETWORKS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE WHICH TRACKS AND MEASURES EMPLOYEE PRODUCTIVITY AND ANALYZES PROGRESS AGAINST ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES IN THE FIELDS OF TECHNICAL SUPPORT, SALES, CONTRACT MANAGEMENT, PROCUREMENT, ENGINEERING, TRAINING AND MARKETING; COMPUTER HARDWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY CREATING, MAINTAINING, DESIGNING, AND IMPLEMENTING WEB SITES AND NETWORK WEB PAGES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY WEB SITE STRATEGY, USABILITY ANALYSIS, GRAPHIC ART DESIGN, PROTOTYPING, COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT, PROJECT MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL SUPPORT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF BUSINESS APPLICATION ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; INSTALLATION, CONFIGURATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |