Drawing for DOCTOR DAQ

USPTO serial 75950307

DOCTOR DAQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOCTOR DAQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Don J.J. Cordell

DON JJ CORDELL60 WILLIAM ST STE 200WELLESLEY, MA 02481UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATA COLLECTION, DATA ANALYSIS AND DATA OUTPUT USED IN PERSONAL COMPUTER-BASED DATA COLLECTION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE AS AN ADD-IN PROGRAM FOR A SPREADSHEET USED IN PERSONAL COMPUTER-BASED DATA COLLECTIONACTIVEMar 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 26, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 28, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 20011.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Feb 14, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 13, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 13, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance