Drawing for NEXTOWNER

USPTO serial 75950597

NEXTOWNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXTOWNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRUCE W. MCROY

BRUCE W MCROY REICKER CLOUGH PFAU PYLE MCROY & HERMAN1421 STATE ST STE BSANTA BARBARA, CA 93101-2507UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing on-line by means of a global computer network an electronic community for transmission of information concerning the purchase, sale and leasing of real property and real estate property services, namely, offering (i) access to buyers and sellers of real property and persons who provide related professional services, (ii) the capability to purchase, sell and lease real property and (iii) access to information relating to the purchase, sale and leasing of real propertyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2002PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Sep 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 5, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 30, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 16, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 10, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance