USPTO serial 75950782
VFLASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2602009Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2002
- Examiner
- SHELLA, MELISSA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VFLASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARL M. ZIELAZNICKI
Elbit VFlash Ltd.250 West 57th StreetSuite 1101New York, NY 10019Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software in the fields of telecommunications and electronic commerce which enables businesses and customers to engage in interactive direct marketing communications by transmitting and receiving audio, video, graphical and textual data over the Internet, and user manuals sold as a unit therewith | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Elbit VFlash Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Elbit VFlash Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by ValueFlash.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ValueFlash.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VFLASH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2008 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2008 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 12, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |