USPTO serial 75950952
WEBPILOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEBPILOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software, especially for network application like navigation inside the World Wide Web (internet); software for exchange of information inside a global network | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Conducting an online editorial office, namely data gathering, data processing, data transmission and data distribution in a global computer network; consulting services with respect to advertisements and offers inside the World Wide Web (Internet) as well as conception, production and selling of such advertisements and offers | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | services connected with networks, especially the Internet, namely the supply of special listings and arrangement services, supply of accessible network entries | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming: multi-media consultancy as far as in class 42 included | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |