Drawing for SEEBUSINESSEXCHANGE

USPTO serial 75950989

SEEBUSINESSEXCHANGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEEBUSINESSEXCHANGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BERNARD F ROSE

633 W FIFTH STSTE 4700LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2066

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035providing computer network management servicesACTIVE—
038providing multiple-user access to global computer information network, providing multiple-user access to local, national and global computer information networksACTIVE—
042consulting services in the fields of computers, computer software, computer systems, computer networks and electronic business computer networks; designing and developing computer networks for others; designing computer software for others; providing technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software via telephone and e-mail, computer software installation; and designing, developing and integrating computers, computer systems, computer networks and computer software for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 18, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance