Drawing for NETPHOTONICS

USPTO serial 75955721

NETPHOTONICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NETPHOTONICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith J. Berets

KEITH J BERETS COOLEY GODWARD LLP380 INTERLOCKEN CRESCENT STE 900BROOMFIELD, CO 80021-8023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009FIBER OPTIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, NAMELY, OPTICAL CROSS-CONNECTS, OPTICAL ADD/DROP MULTI-PLEXERS, DWDM (DENSE WAVELENGTH DIVISION MULTIPLEXING) TERMINALS, SONET SWITCHES, SONET ADD/DROP MULTI-PLEXERS AND ETHERNET SWITCHES INCORPORATING DWDM, OPTICAL SWITCHING AND OPTICAL FILTERING TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE TRANSPORT AND ROUTING OF OPTICAL TELECOMMUNICATION SIGNALSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Oct 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance