USPTO serial 75956050
CLARO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLARO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRADLEY D. SCHNUR, ESQ.
BRADLEY D SCHNUR ESQ130 PRINCE STNEW YORK, NY 10012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | AIR DEODORANTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | HAND TOOLS AND IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY RAZORS, RAZOR BLADES, SCISSORS, CUTLERY, NAMELY KNIVES, FORKS AND SPOONS, SILVER TABLEWARE, NAMELY FORKS, SPOONS, KNIVES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY WRITING PADS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | PLASTIC BATH RACKS; WOOD BATH RACKS; DESK SETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | TEXTILE AND TEXTILE GOODS, NOT INCLUDED IN OTHER CLASSES, NAMELY BED SHEETS, AND TABLE CLOTHS, BARBECUE MITTS, FABRIC BATH MATS, SHOWER CURTAINS, BED BLANKETS, BED LINEN, COMFORTERS, CURTAIN FABRIC, DISH CLOTHS, CURTAINS, BATH LINEN, BED LINEN, TABLE LINEN, TEXTILE NAPKINS, TOWELS, WINDOW CURTAINS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARNELL, PETER
- Other trademarks owned by ARNELL, PETER
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named CLARO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |