USPTO serial 75960000
GROOVY GIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GROOVY GIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin care products, namely, anti-aging creams, astringents for cosmetic purposes, beauty masks, cleansing lotion, cold cream, skin conditioner or moisturizer, eye cream, night cream, vanishing cream, facial cleansers, facial creams, facial emulsions, facial masks, facial scrubs; body care products, namely, body creams and lotions, body emulsions, body masks, body oil, body powder, body scrubs, deodorant creams for cellulite reduction, pedicure cream, non-medicated foot creams, massage lotion, non-medicated foot lotion; bath products, namely, bath beads, bath crystals, bath foam, bath gel, bath oil, bubble bath, effervescent bath tablets or balls, bath pearls, bath powder, bath salts, body washes, shower gel, non-medicated body soaks; cosmetics, namely, soaps, concealers for the skin, face and body, blush, blusher, eye gels, eye pencils, eye make-up remover, eye shadows, mascara, cosmetic foundation makeup, compacts containing make-up, lip gloss, lipstick, lip liners, lip sealers; scented products, namely, eau de parfum, cologne, eau de toilette, essential oils for personal use, essential oils for use in the manufacture of scented products, potpourri and room fragrance; hair care products, namely, hair care preparations, hair cleaning preparations, hair colors, hair conditioners, hair lotions, hair mousse, hair rinses, and hair styling preparations; pre-sun products, namely, sun block sun screen, sun creams, sun tan lotion, sun tan gel, sun tan oil, after-sun lotions, and self-tanning lotions | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |