USPTO serial 75960141
POSTAL VAULT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2900084Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 2, 2004
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POSTAL VAULT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michele P. Schwartz
Michele P. Schwartz JACKSON WALKER L.L.P.2323 Ross Avenue, Suite 600Dallas, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | sheet metal boxes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 26, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by POSTAL HAWK CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by Cox, Bobbie, J.
- Other trademarks owned by Cox, Bobbie, J.
- Other trademarks owned by Cox, Bobbie, J.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named POSTAL VAULT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 2, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 26, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 26, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 23, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |