USPTO serial 75975594
NATURALLY FRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 10, 1998
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NATURALLY FRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ATLANTA, GA
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta, GA
OAK BROOK, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia S. Smart
Patricia S. Smart Smart & Bostjancich53 West Jackson BoulevardSuite 432Chicago, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | light beverages, namely, [ soda water, tonic water, quinine water, ] bottled drinking water [ , sparkling (carbonated) water, and non-alcoholic cocktail mixers, including marguerita mixers, whiskey sour mixers, and pina colada mixers ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 29, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NATURALLY FRESH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EASTERN FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EASTERN FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BAY VALLEY FOODS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named NATURALLY FRESH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 26, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 19, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |