USPTO serial 75975849
DYNAMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2060110Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 6, 1997
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DYNAMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT J SLAVICK
SCOTT J SLAVICK BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEPO BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | * hand tools, namely * wrenches; universal drives in the nature of torque transmitting universal joints or their power equivalents; socket wrenches; and extension bars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JODA ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ROBERTS TOOL INTERNATIONAL (USA), INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ROBERTS TOOL INTERNATIONAL (USA), INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named DYNAMO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 23, 1997 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 6, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 7, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 1, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1996 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 19, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 4, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |