Drawing for COMPUTERWEAR

USPTO serial 75975892

COMPUTERWEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPUTERWEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JANET DORE

JANET DORE MORGAN & FINNEGAN345 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10154UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025T-shirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 25, 2000REINREINSTATED—
Dec 10, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 26, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 3, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 3, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 3, 1998ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 25, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 1998ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 11, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 31, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 1997DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 12, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance